Privacy-Aware Contextual Bandit Models for Personalized Recommendations
Keywords:
Contextual bandits, privacy-preserving machine learning, personalized recommendation systems, federated learning, differential privacy, socio-technical systems, adaptive decision-making, algorithmic governance, large-scale AI infrastructureAbstract
Personalized recommendation systems have become foundational to modern digital platforms, shaping information access, consumer behavior, and socio-technical interaction at scale. Contextual bandit models provide a principled framework for sequential decision-making under uncertainty, enabling adaptive personalization through continuous learning from user interactions. However, the increasing integration of such models into high-stakes environments raises significant privacy concerns, particularly as contextual features often encode sensitive behavioral, demographic, or situational information. This paper examines privacy-aware contextual bandit models through a system-level and infrastructural lens, emphasizing architectural trade-offs, governance mechanisms, and deployment constraints in large-scale recommendation environments. We explore how privacy-preserving mechanisms such as data minimization, perturbation-based learning, federated learning architectures, and secure aggregation influence model performance, robustness, and fairness. Rather than focusing on algorithmic derivations, we investigate the socio-technical embedding of these systems, including regulatory alignment, organizational accountability, and infrastructure sustainability. We further analyze how privacy constraints reshape exploration-exploitation dynamics, long-term utility optimization, and user trust calibration. Through cross-domain comparisons spanning e-commerce, digital media, healthcare recommendation systems, and smart city services, we highlight the systemic tensions between personalization fidelity and privacy preservation. The paper concludes by outlining emerging directions in privacy-aware adaptive systems, emphasizing hybrid architectures that integrate decentralized learning, policy-aware decision layers, and interpretable governance frameworks to support responsible AI deployment at scale.
References
Auer, P., Cesa-Bianchi, N., & Fischer, P. (2002). Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Machine Learning, 47(2–3), 235–256.
Bubeck, S., & Cesa-Bianchi, N. (2012). Regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi-armed bandit problems. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 5(1), 1–122.
Chapelle, O., & Li, L. (2011). An empirical evaluation of Thompson sampling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. Proceedings of ICALP.
Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Theory of Cryptography Conference.
Gentry, C. (2009). Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. STOC.
Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.
Langford, J., & Zhang, T. (2008). The epoch-greedy algorithm for contextual multi-armed bandits. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Li, L., Chu, W., Langford, J., & Wang, X. (2010). A contextual-bandit approach to personalized news article recommendation. WWW Conference.
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. AISTATS.
Mironov, I. (2017). Rényi differential privacy. IEEE CSF.
Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015). Privacy-preserving deep learning. CCS.
Tewari, A., & Murphy, S. A. (2017). From ads to interventions: Contextual bandits in sequential decision making. Machine Learning Journal.
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., et al. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. CCS.
Zhou, Z., & Brunskill, E. (2016). Latent contextual bandits and their application to personalized recommendations. IJCAI.
Wang, Y., Kifer, D., Lee, J., & Abadi, M. (2019). Privacy-preserving machine learning with distributed optimization. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality.
Smith, V., Chiang, C. K., Sanjabi, M., & Talwalkar, A. (2018). Federated multi-task learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Russo, D., & Van Roy, B. (2014). Learning to optimize via posterior sampling. Mathematics of Operations Research.
Sweeney, L. (2000). Simple demographics often identify people uniquely. Data Privacy Working Paper.
Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2008). Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.
Zhang, S., & Yang, Q. (2018). A survey on multi-task learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., et al. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale. SysML.
Thakurta, A., et al. (2017). Learning differential privacy in high dimensions. arXiv preprint.
Deshpande, Y., & Montanari, A. (2012). Linear bandits in high dimension. arXiv preprint.
Filippi, S., Cappe, O., Garivier, A., & Szepesvari, C. (2010). Parametric bandits: The generalized linear case. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
Cate, C. H., et al. (2021). Algorithmic fairness in sequential decision making. ACM FAccT.
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. NeurIPS.
Kearns, M., Roth, A. (2019). The ethical algorithm. Oxford University Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Computational Intelligence Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.



